Monday, May 23, 2011

Are the terms Christian and Freethinker an oxymoron?

Blogging is not new for me, but it has been some time since I have been serious about it. I have been involved in Christian ministry now for many years. However, it has only been the past couple years that I have focused primarily on Christian apologetics. This will be my first apologetics blog. I initially resisted creating an apologetics blog because my time was limited to write and I had begun writing a couple books already. However, this is the new media age and being such, I feel it is good for me to have a web presence beyond social networking.  
Francis Bacon

"A little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism; but depth in philosophy bringeth men’s minds about to religion."            
– Francis Bacon

I am certain that there will be people who come across my blog and find the title “Christian Freethinker” surprising.  By definition, a freethinker is a person who forms his or her ideas and opinions independently of authority or accepted views. The assumption is a freethinker is one who thinks critically about everything. This should include thinking critically about more than theology, but about atheist ideas as well. Yet, the term “freethinker” has been primarily thought of in terms of being skeptical of religious dogma. The assertion from the Atheist has been that by applying critical thinking to all areas of one’s life they will become highly skeptical of any belief in God or the supernatural. (i.e. they are saying if you are intelligent and use your mind you will share their opinion,)
However, I have encountered numerous atheists and other critics of Christianity who by all accounts have stopped thinking critically, if they have every seriously thought critically at all, or for that matter even know what it means to do so. The common perception among them is that by being critical of religion (particularly Christianity in the west), they are exercising critical thinking. However, critical thinking implies not only questioning authority and commonly held views, but your own views as well.
Critical thinking has often been popularly described as “thinking about thinking.” Stephen Brookfield is an award winning expert on education and teaching critical thinking skills. Below is his definition of what critical thinking really is.

“Critical thinking describes the process we use to uncover and check our assumptions. First we need to find out what our assumptions are. We may know some of these already (these we call explicit assumptions) but others we are unaware of (implicit assumptions)…. Once we know what our assumptions are, we enter the second phase of critical thinking, that of research. We try to check out our assumptions to make sure they are accurate and valid… The third and final phase of critical thinking puts the first two stages into practice by applying our analysis to our decisions. Decisions based on critical thinking are more likely to be ones we feel confident about and to have the effects we want them to have.” 
-  Stephen Brookfield
Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. (1987, Page 9)

Having been involved in the field of Christian Apologetics these past few years I have noticed that not all, but most Atheists I have encountered do not seem to be very much interested in the arguments that challenge their assumptions. They will spend enormous amounts of time reading the works of Hume, Russell, Crick and Dawkins, but give little time to hearing what William Lane Craig, Paul Copand or Hugh Ross have to say about the matter. In essence they become adherers to a different dogma, the dogma of naturalism. For skeptics, naturalism has become a mind-blocking dogma. 

G.K. Chesterton
     Of course the most dogmatic of the Atheist orthodoxy will be the ones most dogmatic that their beliefs are not based upon presumption and dogma. This is something Chesterton recognized long ago.

“There are two kinds of people in the world, the conscious dogmatists and the unconscious dogmatists. I have always found myself that the unconscious dogmatists were by far the most dogmatic.” - G. K. Chesterton

Yet, amongst my fellow Christian apologists, we have a much stronger tendency to take the arguments of the so-called freethinking skeptics seriously. It is important to us to truly understand the arguments of our philosophical opponents, and if we get something wrong (in general) we correct ourselves. There is not one of us who has not wrestled with some of the very same doubtful disputations that the critic of Christianity uses against the faith. Yet after exercising our critical thinking skills we have come to the conclusion that the evidence supports that our faith in Christ is well founded.
In this blog I have titled “The Christian Freethinker” I hope to help Christians and non-believers alike to improve their critical thinking skills. In the words of former atheist Antony Flew as inspired by Aristotle, let us follow the evidence wherever it leads!  


  1. Great opening post Tony! Look forward to reading what you have to say!

  2. Yes indeedy! I for one am tired of forever being on the defensive against those who cannot conceive that a rational person could ever believe in a personal God. I myself can easily understand why one would doubt or even refuse to believe in God, even though it is not my view. I think it is really important, from both ends, for people to respect that someone may have come to a different conclusion than they have, without passing judgment on their intelligence.

    I second Austin's comment - very nice opening.

    P.S. "Ramona's Story Time" = Rachel Oja, FYI. :)

  3. Excellent 'first serve' Tony. I wish you well. It seems we are kindred spirits.

    Roger, Australia.

  4. I look forward to following your blog. Not because I'm Christian and want to be able to defend the faith better. Quite the opposite. I've considered Christianity to be essentially mythical nonsense for more than four decades. What's more, I don't think I've come to this opinion without doing a fair amount of reading and thinking on the matter.

    However, I believe that it's time for me to learn more about the best arguments Christians can offer for their faith so that I can better rebut them if I find them to be rebuttable, or embrace them if I unexpectedly find them to be compelling.

    I don't know how someone who has viewed Christianity the way I have for as long as I have can truly open his mind and heart to the possibility, however miniscule, that it might be true, just as I don't know how someone who's been ardently Christian for an equal length of time can truly open his or her mind and heart to the possibility that his faith is false if not absurd.

    All I can do is try.

  5. Nagarjuna,
    No thinking person likes being misled, so I applaud your more recent approach to look at the matter more objectively. It is also important to dig into things and be skeptical when warranted, but I would caution you to read the evidence not with any intent other than trying to get at the truth. It is after all, the thing to which we all aspire. We all want to live lives with full conformity to that reality. I'm not trying to sway you in any direction. But if we want the truth we all need to be honest with ourselves first.

  6. Thank you for your feedback everyone.

    Nagarjuna. In addition, have you looked into any books on the subject?

  7. really looking forward to the blog.

  8. I get a little ripped off by people who equate 'skeptic' with 'secularism'...looking forward to the conversation.

  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

  12. Nagarjuna,

    "I look forward to following your blog. Not because I'm Christian and want to be able to defend the faith better. Quite the opposite. I've considered Christianity to be essentially mythical nonsense for more than four decades. What's more, I don't think I've come to this opinion without doing a fair amount of reading and thinking on the matter."

    Surprise, surprise... yet another atheist who fails to hide the tone of arrogance and condescension contained in his posts. With that attitude of yours, I highly doubt you will be able to take on these discussions honestly and critically. As I am sure you agree, we can see that your replies are nothing more than smoke and empty utterances, products of a simplistic mind filled with ignorance and naiveté, a complete and utter disregard for the faculties of reason that we have been endowed with.

    How's that for a taste of condescension?

  13. Great quotes!

    I've got a blog that tries to do something similar. It even has the same name. : )

    Mark Hausam